The clinical findings behind TheraFace Mask Glo (Therabody blog) / ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07054710
Manufacturer-statedStudied: This exact mask Not peer-reviewed
Single-group, open-label (no masking), before-vs-after; no control or sham group · 115 enrolled, 104 completed participants
What it measured and its limits
Measured: Expert grading, VISIA-CR imaging, Cutometer and self-assessment. Brand reports group changes at 12 weeks e.g. radiance +25.4%, texture +22.9%, firmness (Cutometer) +14.3%, fine lines 4.0%, undereye wrinkles −3.1%; wrinkle depth not significant at group level
- No control or sham group, so changes can't be separated from placebo, season or skincare changes
- Sponsor-funded; summary written by Therabody staff; no full report or registry results published
- Only one primary outcome registered (overall skin appearance); many outcomes reported, with some small effects
- Mostly women
- Light and vibration were used together, so effects can't be attributed to light alone
- Registry summary gives age 39–64 but eligibility 35–65