Human in-use test under dermatological control — Study Summary, investigational product: 1072nm
Source read by Luma Index (results not verified)Studied: This exact mask Not peer-reviewed
Single-centre, open, before-vs-after (no control or sham group; no blinding stated) · 32 participants
What it measured and its limits
Measured: Instrumental and graded measures at D0 and D56. Forehead wrinkle volume −37.1% (significant); crow's-feet wrinkle measures and several under-eye measures not significant; hydration +34.7%, TEWL −18.3%, elasticity R2 +9.5%; self-assessment 75–97% positive. No adverse reactions reported.
- No control or sham group, so changes cannot be separated from placebo, season or skincare changes
- Tests a single-wavelength mode (1072 nm only), not one of the four presets
- Device model not stated in the summary; assumed Series 3 because the brand presents it for this product
- Laboratory not named; summary only, full report not published; not peer-reviewed
- Small sample; women 30–45 only; phototype I–IV only
- Headline 37% is one sub-measure (forehead wrinkle volume) with large spread (SD exceeds the mean)